tnagfoundation@gmail.com

Experiential Interference

-FIRST BE AWARE, THEN BE ACCOUNTBALE-

In this investigation, the subject of interest was the human organism and its behavior, its behaviors which are symbolic of the content of its experience, the content of its experience which will not be without the faculties that it possesses which are a bridge-connecting its internal world and the external. These faculties and abilities which are-but not limited to its inherent objects of knowledge. I became astonished when I discovered how the senses aid the organism to understand their inner working-through choiceless attention and how the eventualities of their objective experience is shaped by this relationships in collaboration with bodily chemicals. [Thompson, 11-Feburary-2026]
Exceptionally, what I am about to say does not come easy to many but albeit, we can look at the similarities I share together and perhaps we will come upon the truth. I followed it thus, that if "ever" an individual is able to reflect on the immensity of these relationships, their inseparability and their effects, to find out how this never-ending mutual cooperation has transformed him/her into an organic machine of some sort that is running a program written by its own imperceptible-symbiotic experience of the world from childhood to when they can start to make sense of the world in contrast to causality of events, their lives become rather less terrifying/ miserable. Because by identifying these patterns, the individual, unaided should be able to glimpse the implication of Experiential Interference and in that very moment the individual will notice certain impairment that has limited them from having a first-hand relationship with their environment. By way of introduction, the first impairment they might notice comes as a strong indication that life does not come with a flip switch or a manual. They will discover that their objects of knowledge, the five senses (that mediate between their inside and the immediate environment) are greatly flawed-for without these faculties they cannot perceive and give feedback to the world around them. It rarely happens as quickly as one expects that the individual-instantaneously become aware of the millions of information that flows to them, and they respond to via these channels, so I empathize that being aware is just the kickoff, and transcending the mere-awareness (Insight) is the greatest deal thereof because it is essential for the individual to evolve through these stages if they must live sanely, and become less impulsive, less harmful to themselves and the environment.
Now, why should understanding experiential interference be given any attention at all, you might ask?
An individual should not be divisive but instead be in oneness with the fact that they and their experience are one practically inseparable unit. One’s experience which is the experience of all mankind (in perspective) put together through millennials of how the human organism see, hear, smell, taste and how it makes contact with its sense of touch within the ecological unit it lives, and not neglecting the humongous complexities of systems he has invented which bombards him with millions of suggestions that dictates which sensory meaning fits as an interpretation for one event or another. Though, a challenging percentage of the time the organism unknowingly accepts these suggestions out of the vulnerability of choice or the inert instinct to survive. Often than not, this acceptance is immediately registered which is then stored up in the cells as fact, and overtime becomes the foundation on which the individual base what reality is, be it for the sake of safety or gratification.

This is what I realized by this close watch, I found out the disorganized-organized (disorder smartly disguised as order) nature of the individual that is stored up in the cells and improved upon through millennials of repetition (which are also subjected to slight modification as they go through the chaos and bliss of life) is leeched to them just like a shadow. Respecting this observations we draw a fair conclusion, that no matter how an individual desires to live differently it is near impossible that he/she is able because the complexity of the program that is ever-at-work fueling their will-perpetually interferes with, and undermines any effort made by them to live any different (sanely or being utterly good).
This I have concluded after much careful observation which further clarified that the being who desires to live differently after discovering its impaired nature does not exist as a separate “decision maker” (ego) who can alter or distinguish its actions (desire, lust, greed, fear, pain, pleasure, hope, faith, joy, love, goodness, etc.) from the fabric of its ecological unit or the eternally revolving program of its experience.
(Perhaps at this point I should apologize that in all, there is no solution to this particular problem, or there is but it is your responsibility to find out).

Leave a Reply